Pro-life
Preaching Hints
September 13 – 24th Sunday in Ordinary Time
Is 50:5-9a
Jas 2:14-18
Mk 8:27-35
“You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.”
This Gospel rebuke of Jesus to Peter applies to us all. In
particular, we tend to think that to be successful in our
efforts to win people over to the Gospel and the pro-life
message, we have to be popular. This is a human way of thinking,
that does not give enough room to the role that the cross, and
persecution, play in the plan God has for us. The fact is that
people are converted by the truth of the message and by the
integrity and faithfulness with which we convey that message
even in the face of opposition. People are not ultimately
inspired or converted by crowd-pleasers, but by God-pleasers.
Jesus, of course, gives the primary example of this. The fact
that the Gospel passage indicates that some people thought he
was John the Baptist or Elijah or one of the other prophets
gives us a good insight into what he was like. John the Baptist,
Elijah, and the prophets were tough preachers, proclaiming hard
truths and inviting all kinds of opposition and persecution. A
homily on this Gospel might well go back to some of the
preaching of these men to illustrate this point.
Success does not require popularity; rather, it requires
fidelity. This is a particularly valuable lesson in relation to
our efforts to proclaim the sanctity of human life in the face
of abortion. People who attack the messenger are, nevertheless,
impacted by the message. That’s the very reason they are
attacking.
The second reading illustrates the goal of our efforts,
namely, not to simply bring people to “believe” in the sanctity
of life, but to have them practice it. We are called to respond
concretely to the needs of the people we proclaim are sacred.
The hungry must be fed, not just spoken about with sympathy. The
unborn must be saved from the violence of abortion, not just
mentioned in our prayers. Whether it’s a candidate for public
office or a Christian in the pews, just “believing” in the right
to life is not enough. The pertinent question is, “What will you
do to protect those who have that right?”
Back
|